Calvis vs Paragon Systems: the short answer
These two companies barely compete, and pretending otherwise would waste your time.
Paragon Systems, Inc. is a Herndon, Virginia federal contractor that staffs protective-services posts for the United States government. Its published materials describe more than 500 federal facilities and military bases served worldwide, over 10,500 employees, and more than 25 years of contracting experience with government agencies. It is a subsidiary of Securitas, the Swedish multinational, and was formed under its current name in October 2020 when Securitas Critical Infrastructure Services rebranded to consolidate under the Paragon Systems banner. Its work sits with the Departments of Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security, the Federal Protective Service, and civilian and intelligence agencies.
Calvis is a marketplace that connects commercial buyers with independently licensed local security agencies. It does not employ guards and it is not the security provider. You describe the coverage you need, compare vetted local agencies on published flat hourly rates, and book without an annual contract.
So the honest framing is not "which is better." If you are a federal agency awarding a protective-services contract under a GSA schedule, Paragon is the category of vendor you are shopping and a commercial marketplace is not a candidate. If you own a warehouse, run a construction site, manage an apartment complex, or are staffing a Saturday event, Paragon is not selling to you and a marketplace is where you should be looking.
Compare published guard pricing first →
Who Paragon Systems actually is
Paragon's business is federal. That is not a positioning choice; it is the entire structure of the company. Its own site describes serving the defense, intelligence, homeland security, law enforcement, and federal civil sectors, and lists a GSA Multiple Award Schedule contract number alongside more than 50 current CPARs, the past-performance assessment records the government uses to score contractors.
The service list reads accordingly: armed and unarmed security, law enforcement response, paramilitary security operations, national disaster response, electronic security, facility security management, screening operations, security escort, visitor screening and badging, and dignitary protection. Alongside protective services, the company organizes into sectors covering investigations, inspections, cybersecurity, energy, risk management, and mission support.
The training claim is specific and unusually concrete for this industry. Paragon states that officers complete over 120 hours of classroom, field, weapons, and customer-relations instruction with practical evaluation, delivered through an in-house institute, and that more than 90 percent of its personnel pass federal security officer certification examinations on the first attempt. Federal protective-service posts have certification standards that commercial guard work simply does not, and a contractor that can demonstrate first-attempt pass rates is answering a question that federal source-selection boards actually ask.
Where Paragon is genuinely strong
It clears the bar that keeps almost everyone out. Staffing a federal facility means background investigations, suitability determinations, and in many cases security clearances for the officers themselves, on top of certification testing. That apparatus takes years and real capital to build. A commercial agency cannot spin it up for one contract, and a marketplace cannot conjure it at all.
Scale inside a specialized niche. More than 500 federal facilities and military bases is a footprint that lets Paragon absorb a large multi-site award without inventing an organization to do it. For a contracting officer, that is a de-risking argument, and a legitimate one.
Institutional past performance. In federal contracting, past performance is close to currency. Fifty-plus CPARs and a quarter century of agency work is a track record a newer entrant cannot manufacture, and it is exactly what the evaluation criteria reward.
Depth beyond guarding. Investigations, inspections, screening operations, and mission support are adjacent capabilities that let one vendor cover requirements that would otherwise need several. That is real value when the requirement is broad.
The 2024 settlement, stated plainly
Any honest comparison has to include this. On November 12, 2024, Paragon Systems settled with the U.S. Department of Justice for $52 million over allegations under the False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Act. The government alleged that former Paragon executives directed female relatives and associates to pose as owners of purported small businesses in order to win Department of Homeland Security contracts that were set aside for woman-owned and service-disabled veteran-owned firms. A whistleblower received more than $9 million, and related entities paid over $1.6 million. Securitas had booked a provision covering the settlement in September 2024, and the settlement amount was scheduled to be paid across 2025.
The fair reading: the allegations concerned the acquisition of set-aside contracts through corporate structuring, not the quality of the protective services delivered on post. The company continues to operate and continues to hold federal work. But if you are a contracting officer or a prime evaluating subcontractors, it is a matter of public record and it belongs in your responsibility determination rather than being discovered later.
Where commercial buyers hit friction
You are probably not the customer. This is the main one. Paragon is built around federal acquisition, and a single commercial site in one metro does not fit the machine. There is no self-service path, no published rate card, and no reason for the company to price a two-week gap at your office building.
Federal cost structure travels with the vendor. Government guard contracts are priced against Service Contract Act wage determinations, clearance and certification overhead, and compliance infrastructure. Those costs are appropriate for a federal post and are pure overhead on a commercial one. A vendor structured for that world will rarely be the cheapest option for a private-sector lobby post.
Procurement timelines are procurement timelines. Federal awards move on solicitation cycles, evaluation periods, and transition-in schedules. That rhythm is correct for a multi-year facility contract. It has no relationship to a need measured in days.
No transparent pricing. Like every contract-guarding firm at this scale, Paragon prices per award after a formal process. There is no number to look up before you engage.
What Calvis is, and what it is not
Calvis is a marketplace, not a security agency. It does not employ officers. It connects buyers with independently licensed local security agencies that are vetted before they can appear, then lets you compare them side by side on rate and credentials.
You see the rate before any sales call. Each agency's flat hourly rate is visible up front and priced by post type, so unarmed, armed, mobile patrol, and specialized coverage each carry their own published number.
You compare several qualified agencies at once. Instead of running one vendor process at a time, you see multiple vetted local options for the same post together.
There is no annual minimum to begin. Book a single shift, a weekend, an event, a construction phase, or recurring coverage. The commitment matches the job.
Vetting happens before the guard arrives. Agency licenses and individual guard registrations are verified against state databases as a condition of appearing on the marketplace, and every guard placed through Calvis holds a current state license issued to them and their employing agency. Credentials and GPS-verified patrol records are visible in your dashboard. Licensing is always attributed to the agency and the officer, never to Calvis.
The limit is equally clear. Calvis does not hold federal contract vehicles, does not sponsor security clearances, and is not a path to staffing a controlled federal facility. If that is your requirement, this is the wrong tool and no amount of marketing should convince you otherwise. Our guide to federal government contract security guard services walks through how that procurement actually works.
Start comparing vetted local agencies →
Head-to-head: how the two models compare
| Factor | Paragon Systems | Calvis marketplace |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Federal protective-services contractor, subsidiary of Securitas, employs its own officers | Marketplace connecting you to independently licensed local agencies |
| Primary customer | U.S. government agencies and federal facilities | Commercial and residential buyers in U.S. metros |
| Footprint | 500+ federal facilities and military bases worldwide | Local agencies across U.S. metro markets |
| Pricing visibility | Quoted through federal acquisition; no published rates | Flat hourly rates published up front, by post type |
| Contract minimum | Multi-year federal awards with option periods | None required to start |
| Clearances and federal certification | Core capability; cleared and certified officer pipeline | Not offered; state licensure only |
| Vendor choice | One awarded contractor | Multiple vetted agencies compared side by side |
| Speed to first shift | Solicitation, evaluation, award, transition-in | Fast; local agencies with bench respond directly |
| Specialized capability | Dignitary protection, screening operations, investigations, mission support | Unarmed, armed, mobile patrol, event, fire watch and standard commercial posts |
| Credential visibility | Through contract administration | Guard licenses and patrol records in dashboard before arrival |
The dividing line that actually matters
Federal protective services and commercial guarding look similar from a distance and are different trades up close.
A federal post carries suitability adjudication, background investigation, sometimes clearance, weapons qualification against a federal standard, certification testing, and a chain of accountability that runs to a contracting officer's representative. The wage floor is set by a determination, not by the local labor market. Post orders are written to agency requirements. Failure has consequences measured in contract terminations and past-performance ratings.
A commercial post carries state licensure, agency insurance, site-specific post orders, and accountability to the property owner who is paying the invoice. That is a real standard and a meaningful one, but it is not the federal standard and the two are not interchangeable in either direction. A federal contractor is over-built and over-priced for a retail parking lot. A commercial agency, however excellent, is not eligible for a controlled federal facility.
If you are trying to figure out which side of that line your requirement falls on, our comparison of national versus local security guard companies works through the same question for commercial buyers, and Calvis vs Securitas covers Paragon's parent on the commercial side, where the two models do overlap.
Pricing: two different mechanisms
We will not invent a Paragon rate. Federal contract pricing is built from a wage determination, fringe and benefit obligations, clearance and certification overhead, supervision, insurance, and corporate G&A, then evaluated against competing proposals. It is not published and it is not comparable to a commercial hourly bill rate.
Marketplace pricing works in the opposite direction. Because agencies compete for the same posted job and rates are visible before you book, price discovery happens up front rather than behind a sales process. For a single-site commercial buyer, that removes the national-overhead premium entirely, because you are contracting with a local agency carrying far less corporate structure.
For a fuller breakdown of what actually drives a commercial hourly guard rate, see our security guard cost guide and the national versus on-demand cost comparison.
Licensing and compliance
Every state licenses security agencies and individual officers through regulators such as BSIS in California and DPS in Texas, and that license always sits with the agency and the individual officer, never with a broker or a marketplace.
Federal work adds a separate layer on top: suitability, investigation, certification, and in many cases clearance, administered by the contracting agency rather than a state board. Holding one does not confer the other. A state-licensed commercial agency is not thereby eligible for federal facility work, and a cleared federal officer is still subject to state licensure when working a commercial post.
On the Calvis marketplace, agency licenses and individual guard registrations are verified against state databases before an agency can appear, and you can review each officer's credentials in the dashboard before the shift begins. Calvis only partners with licensed agencies; it does not hold or claim a guarding license itself. If you are evaluating any agency outside a marketplace, how to vet a security guard company covers the checks that matter, including confirming the license through the state regulator rather than accepting a certificate at face value.
Which one should you choose
Choose Paragon Systems if:
You are a federal agency or a prime contractor with a protective-services requirement at a government facility or military base. You need cleared and federally certified officers, screening operations, dignitary protection, or paramilitary security capability. You are evaluating against past performance and need a contractor with an established CPARs record and existing schedule vehicles. You require investigations, inspections, or mission support alongside guarding under one vendor.
Choose Calvis if:
Your site is commercial, industrial, retail, residential, or event-based. You want to see the hourly rate before entering a sales process. You do not want an annual contract with auto-renewal for coverage you may not need in six months. Your need is a single site, a construction phase, a seasonal window, or short-notice coverage. You want to compare several vetted local agencies rather than evaluate one proposal in isolation.
If you sit in both worlds
Some organizations do. A defense contractor with a cleared facility and a separate commercial warehouse has two genuinely different requirements and should not force them through one vendor. Award the federal facility through federal acquisition and price the commercial site through a marketplace at published rates. Trying to make a single contract cover both means paying federal overhead on commercial square footage. For short-fuse commercial gaps specifically, same-day and emergency coverage covers how fast that can move, and emergency security is the direct route.
Get transparent rates for your commercial coverage →